Jump to content
Soviet.ie | Sóivéid.ie
Sign in to follow this  
Fodla32

Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi and All Anti-imperialist Martyrs Remembered in Dublin 20th October 2012

Recommended Posts

Poster designed by Comrádaí Nico:

 

 

299484_370872559663307_236501873_n.jpg

 

 

 

 

The 20th of October, 2012, was a beautiful sunny day in Dublin. We arrived at the Offices of the Irish Republican Socialist Party, at 12 noon, to open the First Annual Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi Day School. Some people reported strange goings on by the free state police down at the Garden of Remembrance from before 12. We wondered what they were up to. However, they were soon put out of mind, as we held a really excellent Day School, with papers presented on Imperialism, the Western Left, and the Green Book, and with lively input from members of the Irish Republican Socialist Party and the Communist Party of the Irish Republic, along with independent Socialists and Republicans. As has now become a tradition, food and drink were served, in memory of the way Colonel al-Gaddafi brought food, drink and prosperity to the people

 

 

 

From Lugh:

 

Today's commemoration went well, despite the gardaí making complete shows of themselves and trying to prevent it from happening at all.

 

There were half a dozen uniformed garda standing at the garden from 12 (we weren't due at the garden until 3).

 

After we arrived and some had put on their green sashes in recognition of the achievements of the Jamahiriya, we were approached by someone claiming to be from the OPW who apparently run the garden, claiming that a permit was needed and that he would not pemit the commemoration to go ahead. He was told that it was going ahead regardless and shortly afterwards the uniformed gardai plus the same number again of Special Branch came over and tried to provoke a confrontation. Not being able to point to any breach of the criminal law, they became increasingly frustrated and aggressive.

 

Those present were then threatened with arrest for "breach of the peace", although none of the gardai present were able to point to any action that breached the peace, although they did take exception to the reading of one of Pearse's poems.

 

The commemoration proceeded in a dignified manner despite continuous disrespectful comments from the gardaí standing over those in attendance.

 

It seems that the English queen is more welcome at the Garden of Remembrance than anti-imperialists, and that the comprador class in Ireland has again taken exception to the wearing of the Green.

 

 

Photos by Connolly:

 

 

11221543.jpg

 

11221593.jpg

 

11221604.jpg

 

11221614.jpg

 

11221624.jpg

 

11221644.jpg

 

11221673.jpg

 

 

 

 

A message from the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Irish Republic:

 

(Known to us all as Leinne)

 

The above photographs clearly show the dignity of the commemoration for our fallen comrade Muammar al-Gadaffi, murdered by western imperialists and the New World Order. Ireland's fight is Libya's fight, the wearing of the green is still banned it seems, but we will not be intimidated nor shall we fear to speak.

 

These bully-boy tactics of the Gardaí only strengthen our resolve to keep the flame of hope and humanity alive. The liberation of our country is our utmost aim, we will never cease and we will not back down. We will not let the blood of our forefathers, who fought the foreigner invader, be wasted in vain. This is Our country and it is Our right and duty to preserve our country and all our brothers and sisters, and the future of our children, who have been chained to the life of slavery and to the whims and wishes of a select elite few, who's only purpose is to feed like vultures off the poverty and anguish of the people of Ireland. Our sovereignty has been sold to foreign banks and corporations, treacherously sold out by those elites who walk the corridors of power.

 

I am proud to have stood tall among you comrades and next year we will be a number to be reckoned with.

 

Thanks to all who took part in this peaceful and dignified commemoration despite the antagonizing and provoking tactics of the Gardaí.

 

Beir Bua go leir a Chairde!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The following paper was given as part of the First Annual Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi Day School, at the Offices of the Irish Republican Socialist Party, 33 Gardener Place, Dublin.

 

 

On the first part of the Green Book on Democracy.

 

The whole Green Book can be read here http://www.mathaba.n...i/theory/gb.htm

 

The following excerpts on the nature of parliaments and parties were read out at the day school and discussed.

 

What we have!

 

“The mere existence of a parliament means the absence of the people. True democracy exists only through the direct participation of the people, and not through the activity of their representatives. Parliaments have been a legal barrier between the people and the exercise of authority, excluding the masses from meaningful politics and monopolizing sovereignty in their place. People are left with only a facade of democracy, manifested in long queues to cast their election ballots.”

 

“Immediately after winning the electors' votes the representative takes over the people's sovereignty and acts on their behalf. The prevailing traditional democracy endows the member of parliament with a sacredness and immunity which are denied to the rest of the people. Parliaments, therefore, have become a means of plundering and usurping the authority of the people. It has thus become the right of the people to struggle, through popular revolution, to destroy such instruments”

 

“If parliament is formed from one party as a result of its winning an election, it becomes a parliament of the winning party and not of the people. It represents the party and not the people, and the executive power of the parliament becomes that of the victorious party and not of the people.”

 

“Under such systems, the people are the victims whose votes are vied for by exploitative competing factions who dupe the people into political circuses that are outwardly noisy and frantic, but inwardly powerless and irrelevant.”

 

“Moreover, since the system of elected parliaments is based on propaganda to win votes, it is a demagogic system in the real sense of the word. Votes can be bought and falsified. Poor people are unable to compete in the election campaigns, and the result is that only the rich get elected”

 

“Philosophers, thinkers, and writers advocated the theory of representative parliaments at a time when peoples were unconsciously herded like sheep by kings, sultans and conquerors. The ultimate aspiration of the people of those times was to have someone to represent them before such rulers. When even this aspiration was rejected, people waged bitter and protracted struggle to attain this goal.”

 

“The party is a contemporary form of dictatorship. It is the modern instrument of dictatorial government. The party is the rule of a part over the whole. As a party is not an individual, it creates a superficial democracy by establishing assemblies, committees, and propaganda through its members. The party is not a democratic instrument because it is composed only of those people who have common interests, a common perception or a shared culture; or those who belong to the same region or share the same belief.”

 

“The existence of many parties intensifies the struggle for power, and this results in the neglect of any achievements for the people and of any socially beneficial plans.”

 

“To do so, the opposition must minimize the government's achievements and cast doubt on its plans, even though those plans may be beneficial to the society. Consequently, the interests and programs of the society become the victims of the parties' struggle for power. Such struggle is, therefore, politically, socially, and economically destructive to the society, despite the fact that it creates political activity.”

 

“A party that is formed in the name of a class inevitably becomes a substitute for that class and continues in the process of spontaneous transformation until it becomes hostile to the class that it replaces.”

 

The Alternative

 

“First, the people are divided into Basic Popular Conferences. Each Basic Popular Conference chooses its secretariat. The secretariats of all Popular Conferences together form Non-Basic Popular Conferences. Subsequently, the masses of the Basic Popular Conferences select administrative People's Committees to replace government administration. All public institutions are run by People's Committees which will be accountable to the Basic Popular Conferences which dictate the policy and supervise its execution. Thus, both the administration and the supervision become the people's and the outdated definition of democracy - democracy is the supervision of the government by the people - becomes obsolete. It will be replaced by the true definition: Democracy is the supervision of the people by the people.”

 

“All citizens who are members of these Popular Conferences belong, vocationally and functionally, to various sectors and have, therefore, to form themselves into their own professional Popular Conferences in addition to being, by virtue of citizenship, members of the Basic Popular Conferences or People's Committees. Subjects dealt with by the Popular Conferences and People's Committees will eventually take their final shape in the General People's Congress, which brings together the Secretariats of the Popular Conferences and People's Committees. Resolutions of the General People's Congress, which meets annually or periodically, are passed on to the Popular Conferences and People's Committees, which undertake the execution of those resolutions through the responsible committees, which are, in turn, accountable to the Basic Popular Conferences.”

 

“The General People's Congress is not a gathering of persons or members such as those of parliaments but, rather, a gathering of the Popular Conferences and People's Committees.”

 

“Thus, the problem of the instrument of government is naturally solved, and all dictatorial instruments disappear. The people become the instrument of government, and the dilemma of democracy in the world is conclusively solved.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paper given at the First Annual Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi Day School, at the Dublin Offices of the Irish Republican Socialist Party, 33 Gardiner Place, Dublin, on the 20th of October, 2012.

 

 

The "Arab Spring" and The Seduction of the Western Left

 

I wish to claim, in this paper, that the invasion of Libya set a new president in the co-option of Western Left into imperialist adventurism. Following the work of Jean Baudrillard, I will claim that the method used was the age old method of seduction.

 

The failure of anti-war movements to stop war is nothing new. There has never been a case of protest movements stopping a war. Even the Vietnam War, which eventually generated massive protests in the USA, was not halted by these protests, but only by the actual defeat of the US war machine in the field. In 1912, the Socialist parties met in Basle, Swizerland, to promise that they would not support their governments if war were to begin. But, once the patriotic drums of WW1 began to beat, these promises were forgotten, and most Socialist leaders, or mis-leaders, shamefully encouraged the Working Class youth of Europe out to the slaughter. For all this catelogue of failure, there has been a consistant and active anti-war movement, funded by the Left, in Europe and the USA, all down the decades. In 2003, half a million people marched in Washington against the Iraq War. Almost a million people marched in London. In many ways, a dramatic success. Of course, the war was not stopped, but, it can be claimed that the imperialist propaganda machine was severely weakened by such massive display of public rejection. Next time, the imperialists were going to have to be a lot smarter, a lot more seductive – and they were.

 

Of course, once the attack on Libya had begun, the Western media did what was always expected from it, and it generated and propagated the most wild propaganda against the Libya government and its leader that they could concoct. We had the laughable stories about Al Gaddafi giving Viagra to the Libyan Army, so that Libyan soldiers could go about raping peaceful protestors – a story picked up and repeated by Amnesty International. This story was straight out of the German soldiers eating Belgian babies catalogue – or the Iraqi soldiers throwing babies out of 500 Kuwaiti incubators, even though there were only about 50 incubators in all of Kuwait at the time (again, a story picked up and repeated by Amnesty International.) Laughable as these stories are in hindsight, during the media frenzy for enemy blood, they are taken seriously by huge sections of the population, and they serve to weaken any attempt to criticise or oppose the war. From the very first days of the so called uprising in Benghazi, stories began to leak into the better Western newspapers, such as the Guardian, of the rounding up of Black people and their torture, lynching and burning to death. However, Susan Rice, US ambassador to the UN, began to refer to the Black people being staughtered as Sub-Saharan mercenaries. So, that was all right then. The media had its fig leaf for supporting racist genocide. For all that, there were constant reports in the better newspapers (none of them Irish) of the disturbing fact that most of those being slaughtered were not in the military. They were, in fact, Black civilians, many of them migrant workers.

 

So, what was the reaction of the Western Left to all of this? The reaction was even more shameful than that of 1914, when the Working Class were betrayed by those who had promised them principled leadership. At least the various Socialist leaderships, in 1914, could claim that their nations were under attack. The Western Left had no such excuse in 2011, when Libya was being attacked. Here we had a small nation, of only six million people, under attack from the most devastating military power ever put together. The killing power ranged against Libya in 2011, was greater than anything that had been put in the field in either of the World Wars, or the Vietnam War. 120 Cruise missiles fired in the first few days, and then over 25,000 sorties by NATO military aircraft, over a nine month period. And all through, the Western Left cheered on the smashing of the Socialist state infrastructure and cheered on the racist lynch mobs. Even the noted thinker, Noem Chomsky, became a cheerleader for racist lynch mobs – downplaying the role of the Salafist gangs, and claiming that the rebellion was essentially peaceful. The Irish Anti-War Movement called for the freezing of Libyan state assets – used to pay for schools, hospitals, etc. – and for the using of these vital social funds to arm the so-called National Transitional Council (NTC), a tiny group of unknowns, who had spent the previous two decades in the USA, being groomed by the CIA to take power in Libya, and turn Libya into a US puppet state, with a privatization agenda. How could such a thing happen? How could the moral compass of the Western Left have collapsed, so disasterously, since 2003, when massive demonstrations had been organized to oppose war against Iraq – a state with an infinitely worse human rights record than Libya (which was about to recieve an award for Human Rights from the UN, only a few months before the invasion.) In the case of the Iraq War, all the usual media propaganda ploys had been used. Saddam was a brutal dictator. Certainly true. Saddam was a danger to his own people. Very often true. And then, to cap it all, Saddam was going to attack the West with Weapons of Mass Destruction. Complete bullshit, but effective enough on the minds of those who actually watch Fox News or CNN, which is, tragically, the majority of people. But for all that, the Left held its nerve, and organized massive protests against the war.

 

So, how could one imagine that by 2011, this same Left, would have become the cheerleaders for a genocidal, racist, campaign against a Socialist state, with one of the highest standards of living in the Developing World, and with a human rights record that was gaining widespread praise in the UN? Not to mention an advanced system of Direct Democracy.

 

At this point, we must discuss the art of seduction. As Baudrillard points out, in his book called Seduction, seduction is a play on fantasy. It is a promise, a false promise, to give the seduced his or her deepest wish, to make the fantasy come true. Usually, as Freud makes clear, we are dealing with primal fantasies, i.e. the fantasy of seeing and being part of that scene which we were, as children, so cruelly excluded from, i.e. the lovemaking of our parents. And what is the primal scene of the Western Left? What is that scene of joy and release that we are forever excluded from. None other than the storming of the Winter Palace in 1917. We are forever under the spell of Sergei Eisenstein’s great Soviet film, October 1917. The marching Workers in their tens of thousands, the police and soldiers disobeying their orders, and joining the Workers, as they valiently march on the Tsar’s palace of power. It doesnt matter that very little of all this actually happened, and that Eisenstein created a vision of the Storming of the Winter Palace that was a tribute to his own genius, rather than the facts of that night. None of that matters. For the last 90 odd years, we have been trying to recreate that primal scene, with our pathetic pickets and marches – where the organizers don’t even dare to mention overthrowing the bourgeois state, not to mind actually doing it. But then, all of a sudden, the Western Left was given everything it had ever fantasized about. Hundreds of thousands of people in Tunisia and Egypt, taking to the streets – just like in the movie – seeming to topple the dictators. What joy! For years we had been told that this sort of thing had died with Lenin. But, here it was, right before our eyes. And if the Arab countries could do it – so could we. Occupy Wall Street. Sure, didn’t it work in Tahrir Square?

 

And then Benghazi came on our TV screens. The people, rising up against a dictator. This was all too good to be true – but why look such a wonderful gift horse in the mouth? We need it to work, so we can show our own people, here in Europe, that it really can be done.

Seduction is not rape. It needs the complicity of its victim. It needs the victim to want to be seduced. Indeed, it is the victim that dictates the terms on which the seduction will take place. The Arab Spring happened, because this was how the Western Left wanted to be seduced.

 

It is often noted that TV News only became popular after colour TV came into being. The Vietnam War was a black and white war. People could not bear to look at it. Black and white seduces. Black and white is always something less than reality. Seduction is always something less than reality. It leaves something to be desired. You cannot see the picture, unless you fill in the gaps, unless you become complicit in the creation of the picture. Black and white draws you into the middle of the horror. Black and white is always horrific, always seductive. Colour is not like that. It is too real. It is more than reality. It leaves nothing to the imagination. It leaves nothing to be desired. One can sit quite happily in front of a colour TV, watching the mutilated bodies of children, while you eat your TV dinner. Because you are not implicated, you are not seduced, you are excluded from the horror – pushed away from it, by the excess of information.

 

Baudrillard wrote a book called The Gulf War Did Not Take Place. He analyses the way that the extreme media overdose of information leaves the TV viewer with a total sense of unreality. This is war reduced to the level of a computer game. For the Western viewer, no real person is being killed or hurt. All that is happening is that images are being created. Even the US sodiers in Iraq rarely saw the murderous result of their actions. They too saw the war through their video equipment.

 

While the Gulf War was a colour TV war, it could be said that the Arab Spring was in seductive black and white. When the violence broke out in Benghazi, in February 2011, the Libyan government invited international observers and media to travel to Benghazi to see what was happening. Very few took up the offer. That was not the plan. Tunisia and Egypt had nicely set the scene, and the imperialist powers had no intention of disturbing that scene with the truth of violent, racist, Salafist, gangs in collaboration with the CIA and the Gulf dictatorships, murdering ordinary police and soldiers and any Black person they could get their hands on.

 

As Baudrillard pointed out, seduction always takes something away from the scene – the scene of pleasure. The “Arab Spring” was masterful work, worthy of any Don Juan. Without having any real idea of who or what these “rebels” were, the Western Left became complicit. They were sucked in. Joyfully sucked in. They filled out the missing spaces with their fantasies of democratic protestors, valiently standing up to the Viagra drugged soldiers of a hated dictator. That a million Libyans came out and filled Green Square, under the threat of NATO bombing, to show their support for Muammar al-Gaddafi was easily overlooked. A seduced person, a person who is loving the thrill of being seduced, no longer has any use for truth or facts.

 

And so, even after the brutal murder of Muammar al-Gaddafi, by drone and fighter jet attack, and then by a crazed mob, the maddness of the Western Left continued. They continued to dream of Tahrir Square spontaniously breaking our all over Europe and the US - even as the Fascist Muslim Brotherhood put their claws on the strings of power in Egypt, and began to serve US interests to an even more servile degree than Mubarak had done.

 

Even today, after the total failure of the Occupy Movements to achieve anything, there are still some deluded, ever seduced, idiots in the Western Left, who are supporting the CIA \ Mossad sectarian gangs in Syria.

 

So, where does that leave us now? In 1873, the Western capitalist system was crushed by a massive financial collapse. Nothing within that sustem could supply the vast amounts of real wealth that would serve to restore that system. The answer was very simple. In 1873, very little of Africa, Asia or North America was under imperialist rule. The next ten years saw the most genocidal imperialist expension ever known. All of North America was conquered, and the naive population exterminated. The Scramble for Africa included the unspeakable horror of the Belgian rape of the Congo, with, at least, 13 million people murdered, and also included the genocidal conquest of southern Africa by Cecil Rhodes, funded by the criminal Rothschild family, and done in the bloody name of the British empire. By the 1890s, the collapse of Western capitalism had been turned into an unprecendented boom, and the stage was set for WW1, as the burgeoning empires greedily eyed up each others conquests. In the 1930s, Germany and Japan tried to lift themselves out of crippling economic depression by embarking on colonial conquests. WW2 was the result. And we remember the the Great Depression did not end in the USA until the opening of WW2, and the transfer of the entire gold reserve of the British empire to the USA, as payment for arms, etc. Today, Western capitalism faces an even more catastrophic collapse than in 1873. Once again, it has embarked on the conquest of Africa, and the subjugation of China, as the answer to its crisis. The first step was the murder of the man, who above all others, stood for African unity in the face of imperialist domination – Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi. Syria is under attack, as a step towards the invasion of Iran - a step that Russia and China cannot allow, without accepting their own impending destruction. In effect, we are facing the beginning of WW3, to be fought for exactly the same reason as the first two World Wars were fought, i.e. as an attempt to escape a financal collapse in the Capitalist system.

 

Can we look to the leaders of the Western Left with confidence? What would such a leadership even consist of? It seems obvious that we need leaderships that are capable of overcoming their catastrophic seduction in 2011. We need to openly admit that the Left was utterly wrong in its analysis, and was outflanked by an enemy with hugely greater skills then the Left now generally possesses. We must begin to weed out the rotten from the good. We need people who understand that this is a fight to the death with an enemy that will never stop – until he is stopped for good. We need people who are not moved by the hysteria of the majority. Who openly state that the majority are often, if not usually, completely wrong. Superstitious reverence for representational democracy must go, and an all out war on the bourgeois media must begin. The church is finish as a political power, but the bourgeois media has taken its place. It is this place that must be smashed – not just the last holder of it. Above all, we must link with the genuine Revolutionaries in India, Nepal, South America and Africa. Their fight is our fight. The puppets that the second “Arab Spring” brought to power (the first Arab Spring was used to smash the Ottoman Empire after WW1, and install British and US puppets in the Arab world), these latest puppets must be smashed. We must continue the great work begun by Colonal Muammar al-Gaddafi. The Green Banner must fly beside the Red Banner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×